GPT-5.6 Sol Release Status: What Is Confirmed, What Is Speculation, and How It Compares

Status timestamp: July 7, 2026, 02:22 IST.

Short answer: GPT-5.6 is real, but as of this timestamp it is best described as a limited preview, not a broad public rollout. OpenAI says GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna are planned for general availability “in the coming weeks.” Claims that GPT-5.6 will arrive for everyone on July 7, July 10, or “this week” should be treated as speculation unless OpenAI posts a release note, API documentation, Help Center update, or official social post.

The useful question is not only “when is GPT-5.6 coming?” It is also whether GPT-5.6 changes the model routing decision between GPT-5.5, Claude Mythos or Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, and GLM-5.2.

What Is Confirmed About GPT-5.6

OpenAI has published a GPT-5.6 Sol preview page and a GPT-5.6 preview system card. Those are the strongest sources available right now.

The confirmed points are:

• GPT-5.6 has a family structure: Sol, Terra, and Luna.
• Sol is positioned as the strongest frontier model in the family.
• Terra is described in reporting as a balanced model for efficient everyday work.
• Luna is described in reporting as a faster, lower-cost model for high-volume use.
• OpenAI says GPT-5.6 Sol improves agentic coding, biology workflows, and cybersecurity tasks.
• OpenAI says broad access is planned in the coming weeks.
• The rollout started as a limited preview for selected trusted partners after U.S. government engagement.

OpenAI also says GPT-5.6 introduces a new max reasoning effort for deeper reasoning and an ultra mode that uses subagents for more complex work. That matters because GPT-5.6 is not framed as just a raw model upgrade. It is also a shift toward stronger agentic execution modes.

What Is Not Confirmed

As of July 7, 2026, 02:22 IST, the following claims should not be stated as facts:

• “GPT-5.6 is available to every ChatGPT subscriber.”
• “GPT-5.6 will release on July 7.”
• “GPT-5.6 will release this week.”
• “GPT-5.6 has a specific final public API price.”
• “GPT-5.6 beats every model on every coding benchmark.”
• “GPT-5.6 is unrestricted for cybersecurity use.”

The careful phrasing is:

OpenAI has previewed GPT-5.6 and says broader access is planned in the coming weeks. Any exact public release date is speculative until OpenAI announces it.

That wording is less flashy, but it will age better.

Why The Rollout Is Limited

The limited preview is tied to safety and policy concerns around high-capability models. OpenAI says it previewed plans and capabilities to the U.S. government before launch and began with a small trusted-partner preview at the government’s request.

Secondary reporting from Axios and Business Insider describes U.S. government pressure to limit the initial release because of security concerns. The main concern is not ordinary chatbot use. It is the combination of stronger agentic workflows, cybersecurity capability, and autonomous tool use.

This is also why GPT-5.6 comparisons need to separate normal coding productivity from cyber capability. A model can be excellent for defensive code review and patch generation while still requiring tighter safeguards around exploit development or offensive automation.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is the baseline many developers already understand. It is mature, integrated, and broadly usable. GPT-5.6 Sol is positioned as the next frontier step.

The likely upgrade areas are:

If you are deciding today, GPT-5.5 remains the practical production choice because access is real. GPT-5.6 is the model to plan for, not the model to assume is available everywhere.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mythos and Fable 5

The Mythos comparison is complicated because some public discussion treats Claude Mythos, Claude Fable 5, and Opus 4.8 fallback behavior as one thing. They are not identical from a user experience standpoint.

Reporting from RD World says Fable 5 uses the same underlying weights as Mythos 5, but Fable 5 may route sensitive cybersecurity or biology prompts to the older Opus 4.8 model. That means the raw capability story and the actual product behavior can diverge.

Practical comparison:

The wrong conclusion is “GPT-5.6 beats Mythos” or “Mythos beats GPT-5.6” as a blanket statement. The right question is: for your workload, are you comparing raw benchmark capability, safety-filtered product behavior, API access, cost, or reliability under long tasks?

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8

Claude Opus 4.8 remains important because it is a known strong model for difficult coding and long-form agent work. It is also the fallback target in some safety-routed Anthropic workflows, according to reporting.

For production teams, Opus 4.8 has one advantage over GPT-5.6 right now: it is a more known quantity. GPT-5.6 Sol may be stronger on OpenAI’s selected preview evaluations, but access and full independent comparisons are still developing.

Use this rule:

• Choose Opus 4.8 when reliability today matters more than waiting for a new release.
• Watch GPT-5.6 Sol when your workload needs frontier agentic coding, biology workflows, or defensive security analysis and you can wait for broader access.
• Do not migrate a production agent stack based only on rumor screenshots, prediction markets, or benchmark snippets.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is the value and control comparison. It is discussed as a strong open-weights coding model with a large context window and much lower per-token cost than premium closed models.

Third-party comparisons such as Eden AI’s benchmark review claim GLM-5.2 is highly competitive with GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 on coding while being far cheaper. Those claims should be treated as third-party benchmark data, not universal truth. Still, the strategic point is real: GLM-5.2 changes the economics of long-context coding agents.

The likely best architecture is not one model for everything. It is routing:

• GLM-5.2 for cheap long-context sweeps and routine codebase exploration.
• GPT-5.5 or Opus 4.8 for stable high-quality production tasks today.
• GPT-5.6 Sol for frontier tasks once access, pricing, and policy behavior are clear.

Interactive Benchmark Explorer

Use this benchmark explorer to switch between metrics instead of treating one leaderboard as the whole story. Empty values mean no credible sourced value is available in the current public material, not that the model scored zero.

<div class="benchpro" data-widget-root="gpt-56-benchmark-explorer">
  <div class="bp-head">
    <div>
      <div class="bp-title">GPT-5.6 Benchmark Atlas</div>
      <div class="bp-sub">Compare capability, price, and availability across frontier models. Missing values mean not publicly sourced.</div>
    </div>
    <div class="bp-stamp">As of Jul 7, 2026</div>
  </div>

  <div class="bp-controls">
    <label>View
      <select id="bp-view">
        <option value="leaderboard">Leaderboard chart</option>
        <option value="scatter">Cost vs performance</option>
        <option value="radar">Model profile radar</option>
        <option value="matrix">Benchmark matrix</option>
      </select>
    </label>
    <label>Metric
      <select id="bp-metric">
        <option value="terminal">Terminal-Bench 2.1</option>
        <option value="swePro">SWE-bench Pro</option>
        <option value="frontier">FrontierSWE</option>
        <option value="sweVerified">SWE-bench Verified</option>
        <option value="hle">Humanity's Last Exam</option>
        <option value="outputPrice">Output price / 1M tokens</option>
      </select>
    </label>
    <label>Family
      <select id="bp-family">
        <option value="all">All</option>
        <option value="OpenAI">OpenAI</option>
        <option value="Anthropic">Anthropic</option>
        <option value="Open weight">Open weight</option>
        <option value="Google">Google</option>
      </select>
    </label>
    <label>Model
      <select id="bp-model"></select>
    </label>
  </div>

  <div class="bp-body">
    <section class="bp-chart-card">
      <div class="bp-chart-title">
        <strong id="bp-title-line">Leaderboard chart</strong>
        <span id="bp-note">Higher is better unless price is selected.</span>
      </div>
      <canvas id="bp-canvas" width="760" height="390" aria-label="Model benchmark chart"></canvas>
      <div id="bp-matrix" class="bp-matrix" hidden></div>
    </section>

    <aside class="bp-side">
      <div class="bp-model-card">
        <span class="bp-label">Selected model</span>
        <div class="bp-model-name" id="bp-model-name">GPT-5.6 Sol</div>
        <p id="bp-model-summary"></p>
        <div class="bp-kv"><span>Access</span><strong id="bp-access"></strong></div>
        <div class="bp-kv"><span>Price in/out</span><strong id="bp-price"></strong></div>
        <div class="bp-kv"><span>Best fit</span><strong id="bp-fit"></strong></div>
      </div>
      <div class="bp-source-card">
        <span class="bp-label">Data caveat</span>
        <p id="bp-source"></p>
      </div>
    </aside>
  </div>

  <div class="bp-foot"><strong>Read carefully:</strong> these are mixed public tables from OpenAI preview coverage, Anthropic coverage, Vals, Emergent, Featherless, DataCamp, and related benchmark summaries. Use the shape of the tradeoff, not a one-point ranking gap, to choose a model.</div>
</div>

<style>
  .benchpro { height:720px; box-sizing:border-box; padding:16px; background:var(--color-bg); color:var(--color-text); border:1px solid var(--color-border); border-radius:8px; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:12px; font-family:Inter,ui-sans-serif,system-ui,sans-serif; }
  .bp-head,.bp-controls,.bp-chart-title,.bp-kv { display:flex; align-items:center; justify-content:space-between; gap:12px; }
  .bp-title { font-size:21px; font-weight:800; }
  .bp-sub,.bp-stamp,.bp-foot,.bp-label,.bp-source-card p,#bp-model-summary,#bp-note { color:var(--color-text-secondary); }
  .bp-sub { font-size:12px; margin-top:2px; }
  .bp-stamp { font-size:12px; border:1px solid var(--color-border); background:var(--color-bg-alt); border-radius:999px; padding:5px 9px; white-space:nowrap; }
  .bp-controls { border-top:1px solid var(--color-border); border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border); padding:10px 0; align-items:flex-end; }
  .bp-controls label { flex:1; font-size:12px; font-weight:700; }
  select { width:100%; margin-top:5px; padding:8px; border:1px solid var(--color-border); border-radius:6px; background:var(--color-bg); color:var(--color-text); }
  .bp-body { min-height:0; flex:1; display:grid; grid-template-columns:minmax(0,1.55fr) minmax(260px,0.75fr); gap:12px; }
  .bp-chart-card,.bp-side>div { border:1px solid var(--color-border); border-radius:8px; background:var(--color-bg-alt); padding:12px; }
  .bp-chart-card { min-width:0; overflow:hidden; display:flex; flex-direction:column; }
  .bp-chart-title { margin-bottom:8px; align-items:baseline; }
  #bp-title-line { font-size:15px; }
  #bp-note { font-size:11px; text-align:right; }
  #bp-canvas { width:100%; height:390px; border:1px solid var(--color-border); border-radius:8px; background:var(--color-bg); }
  .bp-side { min-height:0; display:flex; flex-direction:column; gap:12px; overflow:hidden; }
  .bp-model-name { font-size:21px; font-weight:800; line-height:1.15; margin-top:4px; }
  #bp-model-summary { margin:6px 0 10px; font-size:13px; line-height:1.35; }
  .bp-label { display:block; font-size:11px; letter-spacing:.04em; text-transform:uppercase; }
  .bp-kv { border-top:1px solid var(--color-border); padding-top:8px; margin-top:8px; align-items:flex-start; }
  .bp-kv span { color:var(--color-text-secondary); font-size:11px; }
  .bp-kv strong { text-align:right; max-width:170px; font-size:12px; }
  .bp-source-card p { margin:4px 0 0; font-size:12px; line-height:1.35; }
  .bp-matrix { overflow:auto; border:1px solid var(--color-border); border-radius:8px; background:var(--color-bg); height:390px; }
  .bp-matrix table { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; font-size:12px; }
  .bp-matrix th,.bp-matrix td { padding:7px; border-bottom:1px solid var(--color-border); text-align:right; white-space:nowrap; }
  .bp-matrix th:first-child,.bp-matrix td:first-child { text-align:left; position:sticky; left:0; background:var(--color-bg); }
  .bp-matrix th { color:var(--color-text-secondary); font-size:11px; text-transform:uppercase; }
  .cell-good { background:color-mix(in srgb, var(--color-success) 18%, var(--color-bg)); }
  .cell-mid { background:color-mix(in srgb, var(--color-accent) 14%, var(--color-bg)); }
  .cell-miss { color:var(--color-text-secondary); opacity:.7; }
  .bp-foot { border-top:1px solid var(--color-border); padding-top:9px; font-size:12px; line-height:1.35; }
</style>

<script>
(function(){
  const rows = [
    {id:'gpt56ultra', model:'GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra', family:'OpenAI', access:'Limited preview', fit:'Hardest agentic coding tasks', terminal:91.9, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:null, inputPrice:5, outputPrice:30, source:'Terminal-Bench from GPT-5.6 preview chart coverage. Sol Ultra is a high-compute mode of Sol, not a separate public price tier.'},
    {id:'gpt56sol', model:'GPT-5.6 Sol', family:'OpenAI', access:'Limited preview', fit:'Frontier coding, science, defensive security', terminal:88.8, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:null, inputPrice:5, outputPrice:30, source:'OpenAI confirms limited preview, pricing, Terminal-Bench leadership, GeneBench improvements, and stronger cyber safeguards. SWE-Pro and HLE are not published.'},
    {id:'gpt56terra', model:'GPT-5.6 Terra', family:'OpenAI', access:'Limited preview', fit:'Balanced everyday GPT-5.6 tier', terminal:84.3, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:null, inputPrice:2.5, outputPrice:15, source:'Terminal-Bench and pricing from GPT-5.6 preview coverage. Treat exact benchmark comparisons as preview-era values.'},
    {id:'gpt56luna', model:'GPT-5.6 Luna', family:'OpenAI', access:'Limited preview', fit:'Fast high-volume tier', terminal:82.5, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:null, inputPrice:1, outputPrice:6, source:'Terminal-Bench and pricing from GPT-5.6 preview coverage. Luna is the low-cost tier.'},
    {id:'gpt55', model:'GPT-5.5', family:'OpenAI', access:'Broad access', fit:'Stable production baseline', terminal:83.4, swePro:58.6, frontier:72.6, sweVerified:82.6, hle:null, inputPrice:5, outputPrice:30, source:'Terminal-Bench from GPT-5.6 comparison coverage. SWE-Pro and FrontierSWE from GLM comparison tables. SWE-Verified from Vals.'},
    {id:'mythos5', model:'Claude Mythos 5', family:'Anthropic', access:'Trusted access', fit:'Top Anthropic frontier workflows', terminal:88.0, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:null, inputPrice:null, outputPrice:null, source:'Terminal-Bench from RD World and GPT-5.6 comparison coverage. Public access and routing differ from Fable 5.'},
    {id:'fable5', model:'Claude Fable 5', family:'Anthropic', access:'Available with safeguards', fit:'Premium agentic coding with safety routing', terminal:84.3, swePro:80.3, frontier:null, sweVerified:95.0, hle:59.0, inputPrice:10, outputPrice:50, source:'Fable numbers combine Terminal-Bench coverage, DataCamp benchmark summary, and Vals SWE-Verified. Safety routing and refusal rates affect real product behavior.'},
    {id:'opus48', model:'Claude Opus 4.8', family:'Anthropic', access:'Broad access', fit:'Reliable hard engineering tasks', terminal:78.9, swePro:69.2, frontier:75.1, sweVerified:88.6, hle:49.8, inputPrice:5, outputPrice:25, source:'Terminal-Bench from GPT-5.6 comparison chart coverage. SWE-Pro and FrontierSWE from GLM comparison sources. SWE-Verified and HLE from Vals/DataCamp.'},
    {id:'sonnet5', model:'Claude Sonnet 5', family:'Anthropic', access:'Broad access', fit:'Mid-tier agentic value', terminal:null, swePro:63.2, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:57.4, inputPrice:2, outputPrice:10, source:'DataCamp reports Sonnet 5 SWE-Pro, HLE, and introductory pricing through Aug 31, 2026. Terminal-Bench not published in the compared table.'},
    {id:'glm52', model:'GLM-5.2', family:'Open weight', access:'Hosted or self-hosted', fit:'Low-cost long-context coding agents', terminal:81.0, swePro:62.1, frontier:74.4, sweVerified:null, hle:54.7, inputPrice:1.4, outputPrice:4.4, source:'Emergent and Featherless report GLM-5.2 benchmark and price data. HLE source scope differs from some closed-model comparisons.'},
    {id:'gemini31', model:'Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview', family:'Google', access:'Preview', fit:'Multimodal reasoning baseline', terminal:70.7, swePro:null, frontier:null, sweVerified:null, hle:44.4, inputPrice:2.5, outputPrice:15, source:'Terminal-Bench from GPT-5.6 comparison coverage. HLE from DataCamp summary. Pricing is included as a comparable public rate where available.'}
  ];
  const metrics = {
    terminal:{label:'Terminal-Bench 2.1', better:'high', suffix:'%', note:'Agentic terminal coding. Higher is better.'},
    swePro:{label:'SWE-bench Pro', better:'high', suffix:'%', note:'Professional repo tasks. Higher is better.'},
    frontier:{label:'FrontierSWE', better:'high', suffix:'%', note:'Long-horizon engineering. Higher is better.'},
    sweVerified:{label:'SWE-bench Verified', better:'high', suffix:'%', note:'Common SWE benchmark view. Higher is better.'},
    hle:{label:"Humanity's Last Exam", better:'high', suffix:'%', note:'Hard general reasoning. Higher is better.'},
    outputPrice:{label:'Output price / 1M tokens', better:'low', suffix:'$', note:'Agent output cost. Lower is better.'}
  };
  const root = document.querySelector('[data-widget-root="gpt-56-benchmark-explorer"]');
  const canvas = root.querySelector('#bp-canvas');
  const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
  const viewEl = root.querySelector('#bp-view');
  const metricEl = root.querySelector('#bp-metric');
  const familyEl = root.querySelector('#bp-family');
  const modelEl = root.querySelector('#bp-model');
  const titleEl = root.querySelector('#bp-title-line');
  const noteEl = root.querySelector('#bp-note');
  const matrixEl = root.querySelector('#bp-matrix');
  const css = getComputedStyle(document.documentElement);
  const colors = {text:css.getPropertyValue('--color-text').trim(), muted:css.getPropertyValue('--color-text-secondary').trim(), border:css.getPropertyValue('--color-border').trim(), bg:css.getPropertyValue('--color-bg').trim(), alt:css.getPropertyValue('--color-bg-alt').trim(), accent:css.getPropertyValue('--color-accent').trim(), success:css.getPropertyValue('--color-success').trim(), error:css.getPropertyValue('--color-error').trim()};
  function filtered(){ const fam=familyEl.value; return rows.filter(r=>fam==='all'||r.family===fam); }
  function valid(metric, list=filtered()){ return list.filter(r=>r[metric]!=null); }
  function money(v){ return v==null?'N/A':'$'+(v%1?v.toFixed(1):v.toFixed(0)); }
  function fmt(v,m){ if(v==null)return 'N/A'; return m==='outputPrice'?money(v):v.toFixed(1)+'%'; }
  function clear(){ ctx.clearRect(0,0,canvas.width,canvas.height); ctx.fillStyle=colors.bg; ctx.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width,canvas.height); }
  function text(s,x,y,size=12,weight='500',color=colors.text,align='left'){ ctx.fillStyle=color; ctx.font=weight+' '+size+'px Inter, system-ui, sans-serif'; ctx.textAlign=align; ctx.fillText(s,x,y); }
  function resizeCanvas(){ const rect=canvas.getBoundingClientRect(); canvas.width=Math.max(600, Math.floor(rect.width*devicePixelRatio)); canvas.height=Math.max(320, Math.floor(rect.height*devicePixelRatio)); ctx.setTransform(devicePixelRatio,0,0,devicePixelRatio,0,0); }
  function chartW(){ return canvas.width/devicePixelRatio; } function chartH(){ return canvas.height/devicePixelRatio; }
  function drawLeaderboard(metric){ clear(); const meta=metrics[metric]; let data=valid(metric).sort((a,b)=>meta.better==='low'?a[metric]-b[metric]:b[metric]-a[metric]); const max=Math.max(...data.map(d=>d[metric]),1); const min=Math.min(...data.map(d=>d[metric]),0); const w=chartW(), left=150, right=58, top=24, row=30; text(meta.label,left,16,13,'800'); data.forEach((d,i)=>{ const y=top+i*row; const v=d[metric]; const width=meta.better==='low' ? (min/v)*(w-left-right) : (v/max)*(w-left-right); text(d.model,14,y+15,11,'700'); ctx.fillStyle=colors.alt; round(left,y,w-left-right,18,9,true); ctx.fillStyle=d.family==='OpenAI'?colors.accent:d.family==='Anthropic'?colors.success:colors.muted; round(left,y,Math.max(4,width),18,9,true); text(fmt(v,metric),w-10,y+14,12,'800',colors.text,'right'); }); }
  function drawScatter(){ clear(); const data=valid('terminal').filter(d=>d.outputPrice!=null); const w=chartW(), h=chartH(), l=58, r=22, t=22, b=48; const maxX=Math.max(...data.map(d=>d.outputPrice))*1.28, minX=0; const minY=68, maxY=94; axis(l,t,w-r,h-b); text('Output price / 1M tokens',w/2,h-12,12,'700',colors.muted,'center'); ctx.save(); ctx.translate(16,h/2); ctx.rotate(-Math.PI/2); text('Terminal-Bench 2.1',0,0,12,'700',colors.muted,'center'); ctx.restore(); data.forEach(d=>{ const x=l+(d.outputPrice-minX)/(maxX-minX)*(w-l-r); const y=(h-b)-((d.terminal-minY)/(maxY-minY))*(h-b-t); ctx.fillStyle=d.family==='OpenAI'?colors.accent:d.family==='Anthropic'?colors.success:colors.muted; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.arc(x,y,7,0,Math.PI*2); ctx.fill(); text(d.model,x+9,y+4,10,'700'); }); text('Higher and left is better',w-12,18,12,'800',colors.text,'right'); }
  function drawRadar(){ clear(); const selected=rows.find(r=>r.id===modelEl.value)||rows[0]; const w=chartW(), h=chartH(), cx=w/2, cy=h/2+12, rad=Math.min(w,h)*0.34; const axes=[['Terminal',norm(selected.terminal,70,92)],['SWE-Pro',norm(selected.swePro,55,81)],['Frontier',norm(selected.frontier,70,76)],['SWE-Verified',norm(selected.sweVerified,78,96)],['HLE',norm(selected.hle,44,60)],['Cost efficiency',selected.outputPrice?norm(55-selected.outputPrice,5,55):0]]; for(let ring=1;ring<=4;ring++){ poly(cx,cy,rad*ring/4,axes.length,false,colors.border); } axes.forEach((a,i)=>{ const ang=-Math.PI/2+i*2*Math.PI/axes.length; line(cx,cy,cx+Math.cos(ang)*rad,cy+Math.sin(ang)*rad,colors.border); text(a[0],cx+Math.cos(ang)*(rad+42),cy+Math.sin(ang)*(rad+24),11,'700',colors.text,'center'); }); ctx.beginPath(); axes.forEach((a,i)=>{ const ang=-Math.PI/2+i*2*Math.PI/axes.length; const rr=rad*a[1]; const x=cx+Math.cos(ang)*rr, y=cy+Math.sin(ang)*rr; if(i===0)ctx.moveTo(x,y); else ctx.lineTo(x,y); }); ctx.closePath(); ctx.fillStyle='rgba(37,99,235,0.22)'; ctx.fill(); ctx.strokeStyle=colors.accent; ctx.lineWidth=2; ctx.stroke(); text(selected.model,cx,22,15,'800',colors.text,'center'); text('Blank spokes mean no public value in this note',cx,42,11,'600',colors.muted,'center'); }
  function renderMatrix(){ matrixEl.hidden=false; canvas.hidden=true; const cols=['terminal','swePro','frontier','sweVerified','hle','outputPrice']; const list=filtered(); matrixEl.innerHTML='<table><thead><tr><th>Model</th>'+cols.map(c=>'<th>'+metrics[c].label+'</th>').join('')+'</tr></thead><tbody>'+list.map(r=>'<tr><td><strong>'+r.model+'</strong><br><span class="cell-miss">'+r.family+'</span></td>'+cols.map(c=>cell(r[c],c)).join('')+'</tr>').join('')+'</tbody></table>'; }
  function cell(v,c){ if(v==null)return '<td class="cell-miss">N/A</td>'; const isPrice=c==='outputPrice'; const good=isPrice?v<=10:v>=85; const mid=isPrice?v<=25:v>=70; return '<td class="'+(good?'cell-good':mid?'cell-mid':'')+'">'+fmt(v,c)+'</td>'; }
  function norm(v,min,max){ if(v==null)return 0; return Math.max(0,Math.min(1,(v-min)/(max-min))); }
  function axis(l,t,r,b){ line(l,b,r,b,colors.border); line(l,t,l,b,colors.border); }
  function line(x1,y1,x2,y2,c){ ctx.strokeStyle=c; ctx.lineWidth=1; ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(x1,y1); ctx.lineTo(x2,y2); ctx.stroke(); }
  function poly(cx,cy,r,n,fill,c){ ctx.beginPath(); for(let i=0;i<n;i++){ const a=-Math.PI/2+i*2*Math.PI/n; const x=cx+Math.cos(a)*r,y=cy+Math.sin(a)*r; if(i===0)ctx.moveTo(x,y); else ctx.lineTo(x,y);} ctx.closePath(); ctx.strokeStyle=c; ctx.stroke(); }
  function round(x,y,w,h,r,fill){ ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(x+r,y); ctx.arcTo(x+w,y,x+w,y+h,r); ctx.arcTo(x+w,y+h,x,y+h,r); ctx.arcTo(x,y+h,x,y,r); ctx.arcTo(x,y,x+w,y,r); ctx.closePath(); if(fill)ctx.fill(); else ctx.stroke(); }
  function updateModelOptions(){ const current=modelEl.value; modelEl.innerHTML=filtered().map(r=>'<option value="'+r.id+'">'+r.model+'</option>').join(''); if(filtered().some(r=>r.id===current)) modelEl.value=current; }
  function updateSide(){ const m=rows.find(r=>r.id===modelEl.value)||filtered()[0]||rows[0]; root.querySelector('#bp-model-name').textContent=m.model; root.querySelector('#bp-model-summary').textContent='Selected values: Terminal '+fmt(m.terminal,'terminal')+', SWE-Pro '+fmt(m.swePro,'swePro')+', FrontierSWE '+fmt(m.frontier,'frontier')+', output '+fmt(m.outputPrice,'outputPrice')+'.'; root.querySelector('#bp-access').textContent=m.access; root.querySelector('#bp-price').textContent=(m.inputPrice==null?'N/A':money(m.inputPrice)+' / '+money(m.outputPrice)); root.querySelector('#bp-fit').textContent=m.fit; root.querySelector('#bp-source').textContent=m.source; }
  function render(){ resizeCanvas(); updateModelOptions(); updateSide(); const view=viewEl.value, metric=metricEl.value; titleEl.textContent=view==='leaderboard'?metrics[metric].label:view==='scatter'?'Cost vs Terminal-Bench':view==='radar'?'Selected model profile':'Benchmark matrix'; noteEl.textContent=view==='leaderboard'?metrics[metric].note:view==='scatter'?'Y axis is Terminal-Bench, X axis is output price.':view==='radar'?'Normalized across available public metrics.':'Heatmap across all recorded values.'; matrixEl.hidden=true; canvas.hidden=false; if(view==='leaderboard')drawLeaderboard(metric); else if(view==='scatter')drawScatter(); else if(view==='radar')drawRadar(); else renderMatrix(); }
  [viewEl,metricEl,familyEl,modelEl].forEach(el=>el.addEventListener('change',render)); window.addEventListener('resize',render); render();
})();
</script>

Release Date: July 7, This Week, or Later?

Here is the cleanest way to phrase it for readers:

Prediction markets, X posts, Reddit threads, and YouTube videos can be useful signals of demand, but they are not release confirmation. For a release to be confirmed, look for one of these:

• OpenAI blog post with public availability language.
• OpenAI API documentation listing GPT-5.6 models.
• OpenAI Help Center or release notes.
• ChatGPT model picker visibility for normal subscribers.
• Enterprise or API announcement with pricing and access rules.

Practical Recommendations

For developers:

• Keep GPT-5.5, Opus 4.8, or your current stable coding model in production.
• Prepare evaluation tasks for GPT-5.6, but do not rewrite routing until access and pricing are known.
• Include GLM-5.2 in cost-sensitive coding-agent experiments.
• Track refusal behavior and fallback behavior, not only benchmark scores.

For security teams:

• Treat GPT-5.6 as a potentially powerful defensive assistant, not as an unsupervised exploit agent.
• Use it for code review, patch planning, threat modeling, and defensive testing if policy allows.
• Keep logs, scope boundaries, human approvals, and environment isolation.

For research teams:

• GPT-5.6’s biology workflow claims are worth testing, but generated analysis still needs provenance.
• Require source links, dataset versions, generated code, rerun logs, and human sign-off.
• Do not treat model output as scientific evidence by itself.

Source Notes

• OpenAI preview page: Previewing GPT-5.6 Sol
• OpenAI system card: GPT-5.6 Preview System Card
• Axios report on U.S. government limited-release request: Trump administration asks OpenAI to limit release of GPT-5.6
• Business Insider report on limited preview: OpenAI launches limited preview of GPT-5.6
• RD World comparison context for Fable, Mythos, Opus 4.8, and GPT-5.5: How Claude Fable 5 stacks up
• Semgrep cyber benchmark context: We have Mythos at Home
• Eden AI GLM-5.2 comparison context: GLM-5.2 benchmark vs GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini
• GPT-5.6 Terminal-Bench chart coverage used for the widget: Lushbinary GPT-5.6 Sol benchmarks
• GLM-5.2 benchmark table used for the widget: Emergent GLM-5.2 benchmark guide
• GLM-5.2 release and benchmark context: Featherless GLM-5.2 release note

FAQs

Is GPT-5.6 released?

GPT-5.6 is released only in the sense that OpenAI has announced a limited preview. It is not safe to describe it as broadly available to everyone as of July 7, 2026, 02:22 IST.

When is GPT-5.6 coming to ChatGPT or the API?

OpenAI says general availability is planned in the coming weeks. Exact dates such as July 7 or this week are speculative unless OpenAI announces them through an official channel.

Is GPT-5.6 better than GPT-5.5?

OpenAI claims GPT-5.6 Sol improves coding, biology workflows, cybersecurity, and deeper reasoning modes. Full independent comparisons will matter once the model is broadly accessible.

Is GPT-5.6 better than Mythos or Opus 4.8?

Not enough public, stable, apples-to-apples evidence exists yet. Mythos/Fable, Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, GLM-5.2, and GPT-5.6 should be compared by workload, access, cost, safety behavior, and reliability.

Should I wait for GPT-5.6 before choosing an AI coding model?

If you need a production model today, do not wait. Use GPT-5.5, Opus 4.8, GLM-5.2, or a hybrid stack. If your workload needs frontier agentic reasoning, prepare a benchmark suite and test GPT-5.6 when access becomes available.